1 Local and State Climate Politics“Politics is the art of the possible” - Otto Von Bismark ( ) Prussian Prime Minister and Chancellor of the German Empire Local and State Climate Politics Dr. Robin Saha Environmental Studies and School of Public and Community Health Sciences

2 The Plan Individual vs. collective or societal actionFeature of the U.S. political system Policy tools or instruments Key policy actors and their strategies Rules of the game States role in climate policy Public opinion on climate and energy policy in MT Local climate initiatives

3 Huddle Up! With your neighbor come up with 3 things you’d do to promote a student climate solutions fee at UM Come up with 3 things you’d like to know to have a better chance at succeeding

4 Some Key Features of the U.S. Political SystemDivided government due to: Constitutional separation of powers among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches Federalism – nested systems of federal, state and local government resulting in dispersed (fragmented) authority and ever-contested power Relatively open government Right to associate with others and freedom of expression Powerful organized interests Primacy of individual (and corporate) freedom and private property rights Short terms for elected officials Campaign financing allowed Enduring two-party system

5 Key Policy Actors Decision makers in three branches of government at federal, state and local levels Interest groups (e.g., NGOs, professional/trade associations, unions) Corporations Lobbyists The media Scientists, scientific bodies, think tanks General public, individual citizens

6 Some Montana Environmental Climate/Energy Policy ActorsMontana Environmental Information Center (MEIC) Northern Plains Resources Council (NPRC) Montana Conservation Voters Education Fund (MCVEF) Alternative Energy Resource Organization (AERO) National Center for Appropriate Technology (NCAT) NCAT Affiliate: Sleeping Giant Citizens Council (Helena) Montana Audubon Sierra Club local chapters Clark Fork River Coalition PEW Environmental Group Climate Action Now (CAN) Student Advocates for Valuing the Environment (S.A.V.E.)

7 Strategies Policy Actors Use to Influence Decision MakersElectioneering Direct lobbying Grassroots lobbying (e.g., letters, phone calls, s, etc.) Negotiation Coalition-building Citizen initiatives and referenda Petitioning / Administrative appeals Media advocacy and campaigns Conducting scientific studies Public education / public forums Litigation Non-violent direct action (protests) / civil disobedience Violence / terrorism

8 Rules of the Game (Got Know ‘Em / Learn ‘Em)Accepted processes and procedures for structuring the "moves" of the actors. Determine the type of opportunities to access decision makers “Rules” define what it is that actors may or may not do to influence decision makers Established by the Constitution, laws, and court interpretations as well as by formal procedures, customs, rules, and norms, as in Congress

9 “Instruments” of Public Policy1. Regulation Laws or decrees requiring citizens or corporations to do something or not Sanctions imposed for non-compliance 2. Governmental Management Direct provision of services or programs to the public, private industry, or other levels of government Includes management of natural resources and environmental quality 3. Taxing and Spending Mechanism to regulate and provide services Also used to create incentives to encourage or discourage certain activities 4. Market Mechanisms Involve decisions to intervene or not into the market place Also used to create incentives or disincentives 5. Education, Information, and Persuasion Attempts to persuade people or businesses to behave a certain way

10 Huddle Up! Discuss changes you’d make to your climate solutions student fee plan or things you’d like to know

11 State Efforts States as policy innovators – bottom up policy making13 states would rank among top 40 counties in emissions Texas would be 7th in the world (ahead of the U.K.) Most states have some sort of law or executive order State see job opportunities with renewable energy Economic benefits of reducing weather-related damage According to Rabe (2007): 47 states have completed GHG inventories 29 have action plans or blueprints for future policy 23 states have Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPSs) 22 states have carbon tax to support renewables or energy efficiency 36 states have alternative fuels programs 15 states have caps on carbon emissions from electric utilities CA, CT, NJ, NM and NY are leaders MA and NH have cap-and-trade for coal-burning electric plants Source: Rabe, Barry (2007). “Taking It to the States.” In Ignition: What You Can Do to Fight Global Warming and Spark a Movement. Jonathan Isham and Sissel Waage, eds. Washington DC: Island Press.

12 California – Policy EntrepreneurIn 2002, declared CO2 a pollutant and set cap on CO2 from motor vehicles In 2005, Gov. Schwarzenegger issues executive order pledging to 2000 levels by 2010 and return to 1990 levels by 2020 In Sept. 2006, CA enacted Global Warming Solutions Act (AB32) Requires cuts to 1990 level by 2020 (including emission from out-of-state electricity) – a 25% reduction from present Establish cap by Jan. 1, 2008; adopt reporting rules for significant sources and Scoping Plans by Jan. 1, 2009 Adopt regs for maximum technologically feasible and cost-effective reductions, including market and alternative compliance mechanisms by 2012 Implementation by CA Air Resource Board (CARB) Among the 44 “early actions to achieve ¼ of reductions needed: Low Carbon Fuel Standard (10% reduction in carbon intensity for transportation fuels by 2020) Reduction of refrigerant losses from motor vehicle A/C systems Increased methane capture from landfills

13 CA – Policy Entrepreneur (cont.)CA also set CO2 standards for vehicles, which auto industry challenged since CAFE falls under a federal law, the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 (passed after 1973 Arab Oil Embargo) 12 states have adopted same standard & more may also do so

14 Massachusetts vs. EPA MA, 11 other states, several local governments and enviros sued the EPA for not regulating the emissions GHGs, including CO2, from the transportation sector under the CAA Claimed that human-influenced global climate change was causing adverse effects, such as sea-level rise, to the state of Massachusetts. April 2007, U.S. Supreme Court 5-4 decision, in favor of MA et al - EPA has the authority to regulate CO2 and other greenhouse gases

15 Further Intrigue California request for CAA Section 209 waiver to regulate CO2 auto emissions denied by EPA CA has filed suit (with15 states joining in) EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson hearing before the Sen. EPW Committee on Jan. 24, 2008 – implications of White House pressure Sen. Barbara Boxer introduces bill to reverse EPA global warming waiver decision

16 Regional Efforts – Interstate CompactsRegional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) In Dec. 2005, NY, DE, ME, NH, NJ, and VT agreed to regional cap-and-trade program MD, MA, and RI joined in 2007; PA, IL, DC may join too RGGI will cap regional emissions at 2009 levels through 2014, then reduce 10% by 2018 8 Midwestern states to develop GHG registry 6 contiguous southwestern states have a common Renewable Portfolio Standard as do 4 Midwestern states West Coast Governors’ Global Warming Initiative Goals for efficiency standards for buildings and appliances, motor vehicles GHG emissions; electric transmission; research Western Regional Climate Action Initiative Market-based cap and trade with AZ, CA, NM, OR, WA

17 Western Governor’s Association Clean and Diversified Energy Initiative (CDEI)Initiated in 2004 by govs. Of NM, CA, WY, UT, and ND (included “advance coal task force”) Reported in 6/2006 and update released in 2007 No staff contributors from Montana 30,000 MW of new clean energy (wind, geothermal, biomass, solar) by 2015 20% increase in efficiency by 2020, as through water and energy conservation Increased transmission capacity Not a mandate – no MOU or requirement to participate - state legislatures must implement

18

19 2007 WGA Clean Energy, A Strong Economy and a Healthy Environment Report

20 Montana Governor’s Climate Action PlanConsumption based gross GHG emission – Figure EX-1

21 Montana Governor’s Climate Action PlanProduction based gross GHG emission – Figure EX-2

22 Montana Governor’s Climate Action PlanSector shares of recommended GHG reductions– Figure EX-3

23 Montana Governor’s Climate Action Plan

24 Montana Governor’s Climate Action Plan

25 Greatest Reductions and Cost EffectivenessRCII-1 (-$21) Demand-Side Management Program, Energy Efficiency Funds and Requirements (& Financial Incentives) ES-1 Environmental Portfolio Standards [Renewables ($10) &Energy Efficiency (-$15)] ES-4b ($30) Incentives and Barrier Removal for Combined Heat and Power (CHP) and Clean Distributed Generation (DG) TLU-1 (-$100) Light-Duty Vehicle Clean Car Standards ES-10 ($13) Generation Performance Standards or GHG Mitigation for New (and/or Existing) Facilities, w/ or w/o GHG Offsets RCII-11 (-$17) Low-Income and Rental Housing Energy Efficiency Programs

26 Montana Governor’s Climate Action PlanOverall cost per ton by sector– Figure EX-5

27 Low Hanging Fruit? (greatest cost saving)TLU-1 (-$100) Light-Duty Vehicle Clean Car Standards TLU-2 (-$90) Fuel Efficient Replacement Tire Program TLU-8 (-$44) Heavy-Duty Vehicle and Locomotive Idle Reductions RCII-10 (-$26) Industrial Energy Audits & Recommended Measures Implementation AFW-7 (-$23) Expanded Use of Biomass Feedstocks for Energy Use

28 Montana Governor Brian Schweitzer recently initiated a plan that mandates a 20% reduction in state building energy use by He also encouraged schools to meet these goals. President Dennison has followed suit The 2005 Montana legislative special session mandated the completion of an inspection of all school buildings in the state. This assessment, the Montana K-12 Facility Condition and Needs Assessment and Energy Audit, was completed in July 2008 and provides a snapshot of the current condition of Montana’s K-12 school facilities

29 Energy Efficient Schools Campaign

30 Recent Montana Polling Data

31 Methodology Telephone interviews conducted with 600 registered voters in Montana. Interviewing conducted from September 18-21, 2008. Respondents were randomly selected from a sample of registered voters. The sample was weighted by region, age, sex, race, and party to represent the Montana voter population. The margin of error for a random sample of N=600 interviews is ± 4.1percentage points at 95% confidence.

32 Regarding energy in Montana, which of the following three choices do you think should be the highest priority for state government?

33 Still thinking about Montana’s energy needs, in general, would you prefer that Montana rely more on developing renewable energy sources such as wind, solar, biodiesel and geothermal power OR expanding coal mining, or doesn’t it make a difference?

34 Many experts say the best way to break our oil addiction is to put a limit on the amount of greenhouse gases put into the air. That way companies will have to produce and use cleaner forms of energy such as wind and solar, produced right here in the United States. In general, do you favor or oppose this proposal?

35 Would you favor or oppose requiring utility companies to increase their use of renewable energy sources such as wind and solar?

36 Would you favor or oppose a requirement that coal companies safely store all carbon dioxide from new coal plants to reach zero carbon emissions?

37 Renewables vs. Coal

38

39 Renewables vs. Coal

40 Renewables vs. Coal

41 Local Efforts Cities emit GHG through sewage treatment plants, solid waste landfills, fleets of police cars, garbage trucks, fire engines, buildings – a lot of purchasing power PlaNYC -strategy to reduce the City’s greenhouse gas footprint U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement – some cities have reduced emissions to Kyoto levels Missoula Greenhouse Gas / Energy Conservation Team Developed a strategy or plan Missoula Building Efficiency Policy for New Municipal Buildings On 11/3 City Council passed an energy conservation resolution University of Montana campus climate commitments under the Talloires Declaration and American College & University Presidents Climate Commitment Greenhouse gas inventories Campus sustainability committees and coordinator positions See readings on Stockton, CA.

42 We are all part of the problem… and the solutionsIndividuals Local, state, national governments Industry Business NGOs Achieving synergy together!

43 America Viewpoint xxxxxxxxxxx