1 Prática Científica 1º/2016 PLANO DE PESQUISAAluno: Leonel Antonio da Rocha Teixeira Junior Professor: Pastor Willy Gonzales Taco

2 PLANO DE PESQUISA Perfil do pesquisadorTema - caracterização e contexto Revisão Sistemática da Literatura Plano produção científica Agenda de Pesquisa Projeto de Pesquisa

3 PERFIL DO PESQUISADOR Leonel Antonio da Rocha Teixeira JuniorEngenheiro Civil (UFPA- 1993), Especialista em Computação Gráfica (UFPA-1995), Mestre em Transportes (UNB-2015) Analista em Infraestrutura de Transportes na Coordenação de Planejamento do DNIT. Desempenha fiscalização de contratos Plano Nacional de Contagem de Tráfego – PNCT

4 CARACTERIZAÇÃO DO TEMAPlanejamento e gestão sistemas de transportes – Rede Intermodal de Transporte de Carga de Grande Escala - Sistema Nacional de Viação (SNV- Brasil, 1973) No planejamento de transportes o SNV configura a rede multimodal em escala nacional, compreende os subsistemas rodoviário, ferroviário, aquaviário e aeroviário. A rede intermodal de transportes, um conjunto de infraestruturas articuladas em rede Trechos Modais e Nós Intermodais (hubs , corridors- FDOT, 2014) Para o atendimento da oferta e demandas de transportes, e também, para a integração nacional e para o desenvolvimento socioeconômico.

5 CARACTERIZAÇÃO DO TEMATrechos modais

6 CARACTERIZAÇÃO DO TEMA Trechos modaisEscalas: (exemplos) 1: 1:

7 CARACTERIZAÇÃO DO TEMA Nós IntermodaisEscalas: (exemplos) 1: 1:

8 CARACTERIZAÇÃO DO TEMANó Intermodal

9 CARACTERIZAÇÃO DO TEMA PlanejamentoMagalhães (2004), modificada

10 CARACTERIZAÇÃO DO TEMA – Fatores de Vulnerabilidade do Nó intermodalLocalidade – Localização geográfica importância territorial e planejamento Acessibilidade - atributo do território onde são implantadas essas infraestruturas. densidade dos trechos modais e nós intermodais Funcionalidade de cada elemento da rede também é um fator importante para o sistema como um todo.  

11 CARACTERIZAÇÃO DO TEMALOCALIDADE Localização geográfica importância territorial e planejamento

12 CARACTERIZAÇÃO DO TEMAACESSIBILIDADE atributo do território onde são implantadas essas infraestruturas. densidade dos trechos modais e nós intermodais

13 CARACTERIZAÇÃO DO TEMAFUNCIONALIDADE atributo do Nó Intermodal - intrínseco a função do nó no sistema de transporte Nós intermodais, que são os elementos que permitem o transbordo de carga de um trecho modal para outro trecho modal,

14 CARACTERIZAÇÃO DO TEMA

15 CARACTERIZAÇÃO DO TEMA Consideração finalA localidade, a acessibilidade e a funcionalidade dos são fatores que influenciam a vulnerabilidade desses elementos tanto no particular quanto em conjunto. Os temas planejamento de transportes, sistema intermodal de transporte de carga e vulnerabilidade são os temas destaques para a Revisão Sistemática da Literatura

16 PLANEJAMENTO DE TRANSPORTES SISTEMA INTERMODAL VULNERABILIDADE PLANEJAMENTO DE TRANSPORTES SISTEMA INTERMODAL Vulnerabilidade de sistema de transporte de carga

17

18 ÁREA DE AVALIAÇÃO: ENGENHARIAS IENGENHARIA CIVIL INFRA-ESTRUTURA DE TRANSPORTES ENGENHARIA DE TRANSPORTES PLANEJAMENTO DE TRANSPORTES PLANEJAMENTO E ORGANIZAÇÃO DO SISTEMA DE TRANSPORTE VIAS DE TRANSPORTE ESTAÇÃO DE TRANSPORTE OPERAÇÕES DE TRANSPORTES ENGENHARIA DE TRÁFEGO CAPACIDADE DE VIAS DE TRANSPORTE

19 IDENTIFICAÇÃO GRUPO DE PESQUISA- Comportamento em Transportes e Novas Tecnologias (UNB) Grupo de estudo sobre Vulnerabilidade e Infraestrutura de Transportes

20 REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA DA LITERATURA

21 REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA DA LITERATURAPergunta 1: Quais artigos relevantes sobre infraestrutura de transportes e vulnerabilidade foram publicados no Brasil e Exterior? Delimitação Infraestrutura de redes de transportes intermodal e de grande escala! Transporte de carga conteneirizada ou não (graneis-produção agrícola Consultas realizadas no período de 29 março a 13 de abril março

22 REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA DA LITERATURAConsultas realizadas no período de 29 março a 13 de abril de 2016 TEMA 1 – Política de Transportes “transport policy” TEMA 2 – Infraestrutura Crítica “critical infraestructure” , “transport network” TEMA 3 – Vulnerabilidade e sistemas de transportes de carga “Freight Transport Systems Vulnerability” TEMA 4 – Vulnerabilidade e Sistemas intermodais de transportes, nós intermodais “Intermodal freight transport system”

23 REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA DA LITERATURARevisão sistemática da literatura realizada a partir de consultas as bases de dados de trabalhos científicos e acadêmicos a partir da exploração e investigação dos temas: Política de Transporte, Rede Intermodal de Transportes de carga, vulnerabilidade dos nós intermodais, Infraestrutura Crítica. Abaixo uma relação de algunas sites consultados. https://trid.trb.org/  http://www.zlc.edu.es/research/ Temas - palavras chaves Scielo, ANPET, Google Academic, PPGT, RAP, SienceDirect, Elsevier Resultados Classificação Análise_sistematização, Documentaçaõ

24 REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA DA LITERATURA

25 REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA DA LITERATURA

26 REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA DA LITERATURA

27 REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA DA LITERATURAEM ATUALIZAÇÃO

28 1 SE CHANG Disasters and transport systems: loss, recovery and competition at the Port of Kobe after the 1995 earthquake. - Journal of transport geography, 2000 – Elsevier 2 M VAN GEENHUIZEN, W THISSEN. Uncertainty and Intelligent Transport Systems: implications for policy. - International Journal of …, 2002 - inderscienceonline.com 3 GM D'ESTE, MAP TAYLOR Network vulnerability: an approach to reliability analysis at the level of national strategictransport networks. The network reliability of transport, 2003 emeraldinsight.com 4 MAP TAYLOR, GM D'ESTE Concepts of network vulnerability and applications to the identification of critical elements of transport infrastructure. - - atrf.info 5 BÄRTHEL, J WOXENIUS Developing intermodal transport for small flows over short distances. F. Transportation planning and technology, 2004 - Taylor & Francis 6 EK MORLOK, DJ CHANG Measuring capacity flexibility of a transportation system. - Transportation Research Part A: policy and …, - elsevier 7 JP RODRIGUE - TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR Freight, gateways and mega-urban regions: the logistical integration of the bostwash corridor. 8 H PECK Drivers of supply chain vulnerability: an integrated framework - International journal of physical distribution & logistics …, 2005 9 J HUSDAL The vulnerability of road networks in a cost-benefit perspective - Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board …, - researchgate.net 10 P BARNES, R OLORUNTOBA Assurance of security in maritime supply chains: Conceptual issues of vulnerability and crisis management. Journal of International Management, - Elsevier 11 . MAP TAYLOR, SVC SEKHAR, GM D'ESTE Application of accessibility based methods for vulnerability analysis of strategic road networks - Networks and Spatial Economics, 2006 – Springer 12 A MCKINNON Life without trucks: The impact of a temporary disruption of road freight transport on a national economy. - Journal of Business Logistics, - Wiley Online Library 13 C CAPINERI, TR LEINBACH, D GIPS Freight transport, seamlessness, and competitive advantage in the global economy,. - European Journal of Transport …, 2006 – researchgate.net 14 E JENELIUS, T PETERSEN, LG MATTSSON Importance and exposure in road network vulnerability analysis. - Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 15 Reconciling supply chain vulnerability, risk and supply chain management - International Journal of Logistics: Research and …, -Taylor & Francis 16 Transport network vulnerability: a method for diagnosis of critical locations intransport infrastructure systems. - 2007 – Springer. 17 M HESSE. The city as a terminal: the urban context of logistics and freight transport. - 2008 books.google.com 18 V MARCHAU, W WALKER, R VAN DUIN An adaptive approach to implementing innovative urban transport solutions. Transport policy, Elsevier 19 V SANCHEZ RODRIGUES, D STANTCHEV Establishing a transport operation focused uncertainty model for the supply chain. … - … Journal of Physical …, 20 F RECLUS, K DROUARD Geofencing for fleet & freight management. - Intelligent Transport Systems …, 2009 ieeexplore.ieee.org 21 MJ KOETSE, P RIETVELD The impact of climate change and weather on transport: An overview of empirical findings. - Transportation Research Part D: Transport and …, 22 T NOTTEBOOM, JP RODRIGUE The future of containerization: perspectives from maritime and inland freight distribution. - Geojournal, - Springer

29 23 JP RODRIGUE, T NOTTEBOOM Comparative North American and European gateway logistics: the regionalism of freightdistribution., 2010. 24 M AFTABUZZAMAN, E MAZLOUMI Achieving sustainable urban transport mobility in post peak oil era. 2011 25 L CHEN, E MILLER-HOOKS Resilience: an indicator of recovery capability in intermodal freight transport. Transportation Science, 2012, pubsonline.informs.org 26 MILLER-HOOKS, X ZHANG, R FATURECHI. Measuring and maximizing resilience of freight transportation networks, 2012 E - Computers & Operations Research – Elsevier 27 JP RODRIGUE, C COMTOIS, B SLACK – The geography of transport systems 2013 28 BURNS, MARIA G. Logistics and Transportation Security: A Strategic, Tactical, and Operational Guide to Resilience. 2015 Taylor & Francis, 380p 29 K BICHOU The ISPS code and the cost of port compliance: an initial logistics and supply chain framework for port security assessment and management. - Port Management, – Springer 30 MEYER, Michael D. National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report: Climate Change, Extreme Weather Events, and the Highway System: Impacts and Adaptation Approaches, . TR News, Issue 300, pp 21-24 31 WALL, THOMAS A; WALKER, WARREN E; MARCHAU, VINCENT A W J; BERTOLINI, LUCA. Dynamic Adaptive Approach to Transportation-Infrastructure Planning for Climate Change: San-Francisco-Bay-Area Case Study. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Volume 21, Issue 4 Content ID , 32 WILSHUSEN, GREGORY C. Critical Infrastructure Protection: Sector-Specific Agencies Need to Better Measure Cybersecurity Progress . U.S. Government Accountability Office, 82p

30 33 AULTMAN-HALL, LISA; DOWDS, JONATHAN. The Role and Position of Local Agencies in Climate Adaptation Planning., 2016 Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, 18p 34 BATABYAL, AMITRAJEET A. Accessibility, vulnerability, and resilience in a stochastic model of sustainable ecotourism. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Volume 43,, pp 71-81 35 GOES, GEORGE VASCONCELOS; BERTONCINI, BRUNO VIEIRA. Modelo de estimação de custos do transporte urbano de cargas com base na vulnerabilidade da rede viária. 2016, Journal of Transport Literature, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 30-34 36 GOLDBECK, NILS; ANGELOUDIS, PANAGIOTIS; OCHIENG, WASHINGTON Y. Joint Vulnerability Analysis of Urban Rail Transit and Utility Networks. d, Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Boar, 15p 37 GUAN, SHI-TUO; SUN, DANIEL (JIAN); LI, ZHE. Measuring Vulnerability of Urban Metro Network from Line Operation Perspective., 38 HOSSEINI Nourzad, SEYED Hossein; PRADHAN, Anu. Vulnerability of Infrastructure Systems: Macroscopic Analysis of Critical Disruptions on Road Networks. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Volume 22, Issue 1, , Content ID 39 HSIEH, CHENG-HSIEN; FENG, CHENG-MIN. The Resilience Investment of Logistics Operators in Transnational Supply Chain., Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, 14p 40 HUIBREGTSE, E; NAPOLES, O M; HELLEBRANDT, L; PAPROTNY, D; DE WIT, S. Climate change in asset management of infrastructure: a risk-based methodology applied to disruption of traffic on road networks due to the flooding of tunnels., European Journal Of Transport And Infrastructure Research, Volume 16, Issue 1, 41 MICHALIS, D; EFTHYMIS, L; IRAKLIS, S; EVANGELOS, M. Vulnerability of transport infrastructure to extreme weather events in small rural catchments. European Journal Of Transport And Infrastructure Research, Volume 16, Issue 1,, 42 MOINI, NADEREH. Modeling of Risks Threatening Critical Infrastructures: System Approach., Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Volume 22, Issue 1. Content ID 43 NOLAND, Robert B; WEINER, Marc D; GREENBERG, Michael R. Funding Resilient Infrastructure in New Jersey: Attitudes Following a Natural Disaster., Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, 19p 44 NOLAND, Robert B; Weinert, Michael D; Greenberg, Michael R. Funding Resilient Infrastructure in New Jersey: Attitudes Following a Natural Disaster. , Mineta National Transit Research Consortium; U.S. Department of Transportation/ Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology; Rutgers University, New Brunswick, 60p 45 PANT, R; HALL, J W; BLAINEY, S P. Vulnerability assessment framework for interdependent critical infrastructures: case-study for Great Britain’s rail network., European Journal Of Transport And Infrastructure Research, Volume 16, Issue 1, 46 SHILLING, FRASER M; VANDEVER, JUSTIN; MAY, KRIS; GERHARD, INA; BREGOFF, ROBERT. Adaptive Planning for Transportation Corridors Threatened by Sea Level Rise. 9, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Issue 259, pp 9–16 47 SKEEN, SARAH; CHIARITO, VINCENT P; EBERLE, JOHN; ERNST, STEVE. Incorporating Security and Accident Vulnerability into Highway Design and Construction Projects. Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board,, 13p 48 SNELDER, M; CALVERT, S. Quantifying the impact of adverse weather conditions on road network performance. European Journal Of Transport And Infrastructure Research, Volume 16, Issue 1,, 49 WALKER, George R; MASON, Matthew S; Crompton, Ryan P; Musulin, Rade T. Application of insurance modelling tools to climate change adaptation decision-making relating to the built environment. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 50 WANG, David Z W; LIU, Haoxiang; SZETO, W Y; CHOW, Andy H F. Identification of critical combination of vulnerable links in transportation networks – a global optimisation approach. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, Volume 12, Issue 4, , pp 51 WU, DAYONG; LIU, HONGCHAO; YUAN, CHANGWEI; WEI, DALI. A Quantitative Assessment Framework for Post-Earthquake Transportation Network Resilience Using Fuzzy Logic., Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, 24p

31 REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA DA LITERATURAPergunta 2: Dos artigos identificados quais abordam conceitos de associados de vulnerabilidade, resiliência, adaptação e mitigação? Delimitação Vulnerabilidade Resiliência Adaptação Mitigação Consultas realizadas no período de 29 março a 13 de abril março

32 REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA DA LITERATURA25 L CHEN, E MILLER-HOOKS Resilience: an indicator of recovery capability in intermodal freight transport. Transportation Science, 2012, pubsonline.informs.org 26 MILLER-HOOKS, X ZHANG, R FATURECHI. Measuring and maximizing resilience of freight transportation networks, 2012 E - Computers & Operations Research – Elsevier 28 BURNS, MARIA G. Logistics and Transportation Security: A Strategic, Tactical, and Operational Guide to Resilience. 2015 Taylor & Francis, 380p 34 BATABYAL, AMITRAJEET A. Accessibility, vulnerability, and resilience in a stochastic model of sustainable ecotourism. 2016 Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Volume 43,, pp 71-81 39 HSIEH, CHENG-HSIEN; FENG, CHENG-MIN. The Resilience Investment of Logistics Operators in Transnational Supply Chain., 2016 Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, 14p

33 REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA DA LITERATURA43 NOLAND, Robert B; WEINER, Marc D; GREENBERG, Michael R. Funding Resilient Infrastructure in New Jersey: Attitudes Following a Natural Disaster., 2016 Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, 19p 51 WU, DAYONG; LIU, HONGCHAO; YUAN, CHANGWEI; WEI, DALI. A Quantitative Assessment Framework for Post-Earthquake Transportation Network Resilience Using Fuzzy Logic., 2016 Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, 24p 52 - A Reggiani - ‎2013. Network resilience for transport security: Some methodological considerations 53 - Baroud, H. and Barker, K. (2014) .Bayesian Kernel Methods for Critical Infrastructure Resilience Modeling 54 - Hughes, JF and K Healy (2014) Measuring the resilience of transport infrastructure. NZ Transport Agency research report pp. AECOM New Zealand  55 - Imran, M. Cheyne, C.; Harold, J. (2014). Measuring Transport Resiliense- A manawatu-Wanganui region Case Study. Resource & Environmental Planning Programme. School of People, Environment and Planning . Massey University, New Zealand . Massey University Research Online

34 REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA DA LITERATURA - artigos selecionados1 - Imran, M. Cheyne, C.; Harold, J. (2014). Measuring Transport Resiliense- A manawatu-Wanganui region Case Study. Resource & Environmental Planning Programme. School of People, Environment and Planning . Massey University, New Zealand. 2 - Chen, L.; Miller-Hooks, E. (2010) Resilience: An Indicator of Recovery Capability in Intermodal Freight Transport. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, A. James Clark School of Engineering, University of Maryland. 3 - Gan, A.; Raihan, A.; Alluri, P.; Liu, K.; Saha, D. (2015). Updating and Improving Methodology for Prioritizing Highway Project Locations on the Strategic Intermodal System (SIS). Research Center Florida Department of Transportation . Lehman Center for Transportation Research . Florida International University

35 1 - Imran, M. Cheyne, C. ; Harold, J. (2014)1 - Imran, M. Cheyne, C.; Harold, J. (2014). Measuring Transport Resiliense- A manawatu-Wanganui region Case Study. Resource & Environmental Planning Programme. School of People, Environment and Planning . Massey University, New Zealand. Executive summary The resilience of transport networks is attracting greater scrutiny at the international, national and sub-national levels. This research report explores the current state of knowledge about measuring transport resilience and presents a case study to address the question is: How resilient is the road and rail infrastructure in the Manawatu-Wanganui Region? This region in New Zealand’s lower North Island provides an interesting case study due to its strategic location in the North Island’s and indeed New Zealand’s transport network. In addition, it has experienced significant disruptions in the recent past, most notably widespread failures caused by flooding in 2004, and the lengthy closure of a significant inter-regional road connection, the Manawatu Gorge State Highway 3 road, due to a landslide in It also provides an opportunity to explore this topic outside of a major metropolitan region. The region’s transport networks and infrastructure also have important social and economic functions. This research report is structured around a proposed Transport Resilience Indicator Framework (RIF) which explores six key dimensions of transport infrastructure resilience: engineering, services, ecological, social, economic and institutional. This holistic approach to measuring transport resilience and is envisaged to accommodate both qualitative and quantitative indicators. Within this framework, data were gathered via analysis of secondary sources and nine key informant interviews. The interview participants were from public sector agencies responsible for managing aspects of the region’s transport network, the private sector and one social service provider. The participants had considerable knowledge relating to the planning of the road network and/or its economic and social significance. They also had knowledge of the impacts and/or management of recent disruptions. The institutions responsible for managing the region’s transport network can identify vulnerabilities in the network, but can also collaborate and learn from past disruptions. Concerns were expressed about the level of funding for maintaining and upgrading the region’s transport networks, particularly for territorial authorities with large networks and small rates bases. The region is strongly dependent on the roading network, with limited alternatives during roading network disruptions. It proved difficult to quantify the environmental impacts of transport disruptions. A case study of the response of a local health shuttle service provided an example of how a community, by drawing on social capital, was able to adapt and respond appropriately to a transport disruption. One key area identified for further research is assessing the capacity of private contractors to respond to natural hazard events of varying magnitudes. The RIF could also be strengthened by the use of indicators based on quantitative data, in addition to qualitative data. It is suggested that one method of achieving this could this could be to adopt a multi-disciplinary approach, drawing on expertise, methods and perspectives from related professions, such as engineering and economics.

36 PROBLEMA

37 PROBLEMA

38 2 - Chen, L. ; Miller-Hooks, E2 - Chen, L.; Miller-Hooks, E. (2010) Resilience: An Indicator of Recovery Capability in Intermodal Freight Transport. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, A. James Clark School of Engineering, University of Maryland. Resilience: An Indicator of Recovery Capability in Intermodal Freight Transport Lichun Chen Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, A. James Clark School of Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742 Elise Miller-Hooks Permalink: http://dx.doi.org/ /trsc Received: April 1, 2008 Accepted: July 1, 2010 Published Online: August 18, 2011 Page Range: PROCEEDINGS Vulnerability, Uncertainty, and Risk: Quantification, Mitigation, and Management

39 ABSTRACT In this paper, an indicator of network resilience is defined that quantifies the ability of an intermodal freight transport network to recover from disruptions due to natural or human-caused disaster. The indicator considers the network's inherent ability to cope with the negative consequences of disruptions as a result of its topological and operational attributes. Furthermore, the indicator explicitly accounts for the impact of potential recovery activities that might be taken in the immediate aftermath of the disruption to meet target operational service levels while adhering to a fixed budget. A stochastic mixed-integer program is proposed for quantifying network resilience and identifying an optimal postevent course of action (i.e., set of activities) to take. To solve this mathematical program, a technique that accounts for dependencies in random link attributes based on concepts of Benders decomposition, column generation, and Monte Carlo simulation is proposed. Experiments were conducted to illustrate the resilience concept and procedure for its measurement, and to assess the role of network topology in its magnitude. Keywords: resilience ; reliability ; vulnerability ; flexibility ; disaster management ; intermodal freight transport

40 Summary of Final Report BC-354-44, Part A FDOT (2003)Updating and Improving Methodology for Prioritizing Highway Project Locations on the Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Relatórios de Projetos de Pesquisa INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION PROBLEM STATEMENT Intermodal transportation is an increasingly important aspect of Florida’s transportation system, one with the potential to boost the State’s economic development and sustain its environment. As such, intermodalism—the concept behind intermodal transportation—is increasingly drawing attention and consideration from agencies and policymakers at all levels of government. Intermodalism and intermodal transportation can be ambiguous terms. Clarifying their meaning, their historical application and development, and, indeed, the government’s role in transportation planning aids the planning of an integrated, intermodal transportation system. OBJECTIVES This project addresses the following questions: 1. What is intermodal transportation, and what is its relevance to Florida from economic, environmental, and social perspectives? 2. How has Florida’s intermodal transportation network responded to changes in state and federal regulatory regimes? 3. What is the current legislative environment for intermodalism? 4. What is an economist's view of the role of government in transportation planning and investment? This project also seeks to provide a brief proposal for a course of action for analyzing the appropriateness of state-funded projects. Summary of Final Report BC , Part A FDOT (2003)

41

42

43 3 - Gan, A. ; Raihan, A. ; Alluri, P. ; Liu, K. ; Saha, D. (2015)3 - Gan, A.; Raihan, A.; Alluri, P.; Liu, K.; Saha, D. (2015). Updating and Improving Methodology for Prioritizing Highway Project Locations on the Strategic Intermodal System (SIS). Research Center Florida Department of Transportation . Lehman Center for Transportation Research . Florida International University

44 CONTEXTO

45

46 CONTEXTO

47 JUSTIFICATIVA A identificação dos fatores de vulnerabilidade inerente a infraestrutura de transporte permite planejar as adequações no sistema. A vulnerabilidade em redes de transportes multimodal pode ser identificada com as análises da vulnerabilidade dos arcos, trechos modais rodoviários, ferroviários, aquaviários e também dos nós intermodais como os portos, estações ferroviárias, centros logísticos A análise da vulnerabilidade pode apoiar a identificação da criticidade da infraestrutura, mesmo alguns nós intermodais podem ser identificados como infraestrutura crítica

48 PLANO PRODUÇÃO CIENTÍFICATransportation Research. Part A, Policy and Practice ENGENHARIAS I A1 Transportes (Rio de Janeiro) ENGENHARIAS I B2 Revista de Administração Pública ENGENHARIAS I A2

49 PLANO PRODUÇÃO CIENTÍFICAOBJETIVO: SUBMISSÃO DE PROJETO DE PESQUISA PARA FINANCIAMENTO POR AGÊNCIA FINANCIADORA

50 AGENDA DE PESQUISA EM REVISÃO

51 Exemplo de fundo financiador de estudos em intermodalidade de transportes de carga

52

53 PROJETO DE PESQUISA - ELABORAÇÃOMétodo de análise da vulnerabilidade da infraestrutura de transporte de carga Contexto; Justificativa Problema Hipótese Objetivos Etapas da Pesquisa Financiamento

54 CONTEXTO A vulnerabilidade em redes de transportes multimodal pode ser identificada com as análises da vulnerabilidade dos arcos, trechos modais rodoviários, ferroviários, aquaviários e também dos nós intermodais como os portos, estações ferroviárias, centros logísticos. Identificar a infraestrutura crítica para indicar qual a vulnerabilidade e os fatores de localidade, acessibilidade e funcionalidade da infraestrutura de transporte permite analisar a vulnerabilidade e a resiliência da infraestrutura representada pela capacidade de realizar as adequações que são identificadas quando determinados a distribuição dos fatores de vulnerabilidade. A indicação da resiliência da infraestrutura é importante para apoiar o planejamento, inclusive do dimensionamento das adequações no sistema. A análise da vulnerabilidade pode apoiar a identificação da criticidade da infraestrutura, mesmo alguns nós intermodais podem ser identificados como infraestrutura crítica

55 PROBLEMA Como identificar a infraestrutura critica por meio da classificação da vulnerabilidade dos trechos modais e nós intermodais? Quais são as medidas que podem ser adotadas para um rede de transportes resiliente?

56 OBJETIVO Identificar a infraestrutura crítica para indicar qual a vulnerabilidade Identificar os fatores de vulnerabilidade e as relações com a resiliência da infraestrutura representada pela capacidade de realizar as adequações que são identificadas quando determinados a distribuição dos fatores de vulnerabilidade

57 Leonel Antonio da Rocha Teixeira JuniorOBRIGADO! Leonel Antonio da Rocha Teixeira Junior