1 Slide 1 La fiabilidad del Texto de Nuestras Biblias inglesas

2

3 Slide 3 “Refiriéndose a esto, cuando usted leyó que usted puede entender mi visión en el misterio de Cristo” (Eph. 3:4).

4 Slide 4 EFESIOS 5:17

5 Slide 5 “Para que la fe viene de oír, y oyendo por la palabra de Cristo” (Rom. 10:17). Ningún texto fiable… ¡Ninguna fe & ninguna salvación!

6 Slide 6 “El césped marchita, la flor se marchita, cuando la respiración del SEÑOR sopla en él; ciertamente las personas son el césped. El césped marchita, la flor se marchita, pero la palabra de nuestro Dios está de pie para siempre” (Isa. 40:7-8).

7 Slide 7 “El cielo y tierra fallecerán, pero Mis palabras no fallecerán” (Luke 21:23).

8 Slide 8 Casi 87,000,000 Biblias publicaron cada añoCasi 87,000,000 Biblias publicaron cada año 22 copias todos los minutos de todos los días22 copias todos los minutos de todos los días El texto completo aparece en encima de 240 idiomas y porciones traducidas en encima de 739 idiomas adicionales y dialectos.El texto completo aparece en encima de 240 idiomas y porciones traducidas en encima de 739 idiomas adicionales y dialectos. La Palabra indestructible de Dios

9 Slide 9 “Para siempre, SEÑOR de O, Su palabra es fija en el cielo. Su fidelidad continúa a lo largo de todas las generaciones; Usted estableció la tierra, y está de pie” (Salmo 119:89-90).

10 La biblia tradujo los tantos tiempos ningún más largo fiable…

11 Bible translated so many times no longer reliable…  No confiado en la transmisión oral  No la traducción de una traducción pero de los idiomas originales  Tenga las copias múltiples en el idioma original  De griego a inglés

12 La biblia copió los tantos tiempos ningún más largo fiable…  ¿Es razonable aceptar lo que nosotros tenemos hoy como fiable?  ¿Dios podría vigilar la transcripción de Su Palabra?  ¿Por qué revele la Palabra para la salvación de hombre & le permite ser adulterado?

13 ¿Qué si las escrituras originales conservaran? Muchos son los goofy cuando viene a algo como la Mortaja de Turin. ¿Imagine lo que ellos harían con un manuscrito original?

14 Bible copied so many times no longer reliable…  Is it reasonable to accept what we have today as reliable?  Could God have superintended the transcription of His Word?  Why Word for man’s salvation & allow it to be corrupted?

15 Bible copied so many times no longer reliable…  Is it reasonable to accept what we have today as reliable?  Could God have superintended the transcription of His Word?  Why reveal Word for man’s salvation & allow it to be corrupted?

16 Bibliographic Tests for the Reliability of the New Testament “ examination of the textual transmission by which documents reach us…” 5,300 Greek manuscripts of N.T. – nothing close to this all of ancient literature!

17 “In no other case is the interval of time between the composition of the book and the date of the earliest extant (complete) manuscripts so short as in that of the New Testament. The books of the New Testament were written in the latter part of the first century; the earliest extant manuscripts (trifling scraps excepted) are of the fourth century - say from 250 to 300 years later. This may sound a considerable interval, but it is nothing to that which parts most of the great classical authors from their earliest manuscripts. We believe that we have in all essentials an accurate text of the seven extant plays of Sophocles; yet the earliest substantial manuscript upon which it is based was written more than 1400 years after the poet’s death” (Sir Frederic G. Kenyon, Handbook to the Textual Criticism of the Bible, p.4).

18 New Testament 45-100 AD 125 AD 25 years 24,000 325-350 AD 250 years

19

20

21 Significance of the Dead Sea Scrolls Can embrace the text of the Old Testament with greater confidence. Until 1947, the earliest manuscripts dated back to around the 10 th century AD. (Masoretic Text approx. 980 AD)Until 1947, the earliest manuscripts dated back to around the 10 th century AD. (Masoretic Text approx. 980 AD) Dead Sea Scrolls take us back hundreds of years earlier than the Masoretic TextDead Sea Scrolls take us back hundreds of years earlier than the Masoretic Text

22 Dating of the Dead Sea Scrolls Archaeological Evidence Coins found from the reign of Antiochus VII Sidetes (138-129 BC) Coins found from the reign of Antiochus VII Sidetes (138-129 BC) Architecture associated with the time of Alexander Jannaeus (103-76 BC). Architecture associated with the time of Alexander Jannaeus (103-76 BC). In remains at Qumran is evidence of a 1 st century earthquake around 31 BC

23 Dating of the Dead Sea Scrolls “Palaeographic” Evidence The study of ancient writing and, more specifically, the shape and style of letters ime frame of a document can be determined, in part, from the shape of its letters Time frame of a document can be determined, in part, from the shape of its letters 250-150 BC 150-30 BC and 30 BC – 70 AD

24 Chronology of major early manuscripts: Manuscriptdate contents Codex Vaticanus325-350most of OT & most of NT through Hebrews; not found until 1850’s; near universal agreement it is among most reliable

25 Chronology of major early manuscripts: Manuscriptdate contents Codex Sinaiticus350 ADentire NT; large portion of Greek OT; found in 1830

26 Chronology of major early manuscripts: Manuscriptdate contents Codex Alexandrinus400 ADOT in Greek; most of NT

27 Chronology of major early manuscripts: Manuscriptdate contents Codex BezaeBi-lingual manuscript 4 Gospels, Acts, fragment of 3 John

28 Chronology of major early manuscripts: Manuscriptdate contents Codex Ephraemica 450 AD3/5 of whole N.T. portions of every book in N.T.

29 Chronology of major early manuscripts: Manuscriptdate contents Chester Beaty Papyri200 ADmajor portions of NT but not all John Rylands125-130 AD portions of John

30 Chronology of major early manuscripts: Manuscriptdate contents Bodmer Papyrus II150-200 ADmost of John/some Luke

31 Dead Sea Scrolls & Masoretic Text Prior to discovery of Dead Sea Scrolls, the earliest extant Old Testament texts were those known as the Masoretic Text Dated from about 980 AD Since the Old Testament was completed around 400 BC, the gap between the original autographs and the earliest extant copy was about 1,300 years.

32 Dead Sea Scrolls & Masoretic Text Dead Sea Scrolls provide powerful evidence for the accuracy of the Masoretic Text Dead Sea Scrolls provide powerful evidence for the accuracy of the Masoretic Text Isaiah scrolls Isaiah scrolls Shorten Gap by 500 yearsShorten Gap by 500 years 5% variation5% variation

33 Isaiah Scroll

34 Dead Sea Scrolls & Masoretic Text Dead Sea Scrolls provide powerful evidence for the accuracy of the Masoretic Text Dead Sea Scrolls provide powerful evidence for the accuracy of the Masoretic Text Isaiah scrolls Isaiah scrolls Shorten Gap by 500 yearsShorten Gap by 500 years 5% variation5% variation Daniel scrolls – very consisted in content Daniel scrolls – very consisted in content

35 “First, for the most part, the Dead Sea Scroll manuscripts of Daniel are very consistent in content among themselves, containing very few variants. Second, the Qumran fragments conform very closely to the Masoretic Text overall, with only a few rare variants in the former that side with the Septuagint version. Third, the transitions from Hebrew to Aramaic are preserved in the Qumran fragments. Based on such overwhelming data, it is evident that the Masoretic Text is a well-preserved rendition of Daniel. In short, Qumran assures us that we can be reasonably confident that the Daniel text on which our English translations are based is one of integrity. Practically speaking, this means that we have at our disposal, through faithful translations of the original, the truth God revealed to Daniel centuries ago” (Gerhard Hasel).

36 Evidence from 1 st and 2 nd Century Writers Important source for reconstruction of the text of the New Testament “…so extensive are these citations that if all other sources for our knowledge of the text of the New Testament were destroyed, they would be sufficient alone for the reconstruction of practically the entire New Testament” Bruce M. Metzger. The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption and Restoration. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press (1968), 86.

37 Evidence from 1 st and 2 nd Century Writers Important source for reconstruction of the text of the New Testament Dalrymple found all but 11 verses of the N.T. 32,000 quotations prior to Council of Nicea in 325 AD Eusebius placed number of quotations at 36,000

38 Textual Variants in NT Manuscripts  Out of 24,000 manuscripts there are some 200,000 variants  All errors (variants) are counted whether significant or not

39 Textual Variants in NT Manuscripts  Out of 24,000 manuscripts there are some 200,000 variants  All errors (variants) are counted whether significant or not  Geisler & Nix conclude that only 40 lines (400 words) are in doubt; at least 98.33% pure

40 Westcott & Hort  Error rate at less than 0.001% “If comparative trivialities, such as changes of order, the insertion or omission of the article with proper names, and the like, are set aside, the words in our opinion still subject to doubt can hardly amount to more than a thousandth part of the whole New Testament.”

41 Slide 41 John 5:3b-4 7:53-8:11 1 John 5:7 Mark 16:9-20 Acts 8:37 …not one significant matter of faith would be disputed, omitted or threatened!

42 Slide 42 “The Christian can take the whole Bible in his hand and say without fear or hesitation that he holds in it the true word of God, handed down without essential loss from generation to generation throughout the centuries” Neil Lightfoot. How We Got the Bible. Abilene, TX: ACU Press (1986), 126.

43