1 Updated Survey Results of DOE Accelerators D&D ActivitiesScott Davis, DOE OS Craig Fish, LLNL Gail Mattson, BNL August 16, 2017 This template can be used as a starter file for presenting training materials in a group setting. Sections Right-click on a slide to add sections. Sections can help to organize your slides or facilitate collaboration between multiple authors. Notes Use the Notes section for delivery notes or to provide additional details for the audience. View these notes in Presentation View during your presentation. Keep in mind the font size (important for accessibility, visibility, videotaping, and online production) Coordinated colors Pay particular attention to the graphs, charts, and text boxes. Consider that attendees will print in black and white or grayscale. Run a test print to make sure your colors work when printed in pure black and white and grayscale. Graphics, tables, and graphs Keep it simple: If possible, use consistent, non-distracting styles and colors. Label all graphs and tables.

2 Development of Survey Purpose:To obtain updated information for DOE Accelerator Sites regarding D&D activities associated with accelerator(s) past, present and future Based on feedback from last year, refined the survey from nine questions to just five questions Revised from an online survey format to a Word.doc. Sent out on June 30, 2017 and closed July 21, 2017, then extended to August 4, 2017. David Freeman sent to everyone on the Accelerator Safety community distribution list representing all 10 DOE sites. Received input (some partial and some more complete) now from 9 DOE sites. Give a brief overview of the presentation. Describe the major focus of the presentation and why it is important. Introduce each of the major topics. To provide a road map for the audience, you can repeat this Overview slide throughout the presentation, highlighting the particular topic you will discuss next.

3 What are you going to do with all of this information?In this session we wanted to identify the number of accelerator facilities that were headed for D&D, had been through some D&D, or the amount of reuse we have accomplished with the community. We have put a considerable amount of effort into defining these processes and we need to capture the level of effort and potential costs savings to the Department and communicate this to Senior Management. Based upon the results of our D&D effort, do we need more guidance, contract language, funding, recognition of success to ensure we can continue to successfully D&D these facilities. Scorecard!

4 Question 1 – List past, current, and proposed project involving D&D of accelerator or other rad impacted facilities. Site Past Current Proposed Total ANL Intense Pulsed Neutron Facility to safe state Intense Pulsed Neutron Facility D&D 1 BNL Linac A, B, C & D beamlines Muon g-2 Experiment AGS Components, NSLS, JSW Cyclotron AGS Switchyard Source Development Lab EBCO Cyclotron ERL ATF in Bldg 820 10 FNAL Tevatron Collider Components None JLAB  12 GeV Upgrade  Double CEBAF Energy  2 LANL LBL LOASIS Predecessors 88” Accelerator Reconfigurations Old Town Phase 1 Old Town Phases 2, 3 &4 3 LLNL B-865 Advanced Test Accelerator (ATA) B-175 MARS E-Beam B-251 Heavy Element B-280 Pool Reactor B-292 Neutron Source 5 ORNL ORELA? and HRIBF?  2? Sandia Handled as part of waste disposal - SLAC LCLSII Sectors 0-10 Beam Switch Yard 2  11 – perhaps 13?  5  10  26

5 Question 2 - Extent of activated materials and/or contaminated materials and disposition. Types of wastes that were managed. Activated (volumetric) vs rad contaminated (surface and/or volumetric)? Site Waste Disposition Pathway Other Waste ANL - BNL Linac A, B, C & D beamlines Muon g-2 Experiment AGS Components JSW Cyclotron NSLS Recycled scrap metal, Reused components, 1000 m3 to NNSS 600 m3 to Utah Muon g-2 Experiment - sent to FermiLab 40 m3 Haz Waste 1760 m3 Industrial Waste FNAL Reused & recycled JLAB  Scrap metal, concrete, magnets, beamline  ~640 tons LANL LBL Rad, Mixed, TPH and PCB ~3000 CYDs sent to NNSS None LLNL B-865 ATA – majority not rad based on field surveys Recycling, waiting for scrap metal value to increase Other ORNL ORELA? and HRIBF?  - Sandia Clearance Surveys SLAC Beam Switch Yard LCLSII Sectors 0-10

6 Question 3 - How were cost avoidance or cost recovery objectives achieved; i.e. scrap metal recycling for rad or municipal landfill waste reduction? Site Cost Avoidance Cost Recovery ANL Estimated Replacement Values - BNL Linac A, B, C & D beamlines - ASER Muon g-2 Experiment - ASER AGS Components - ASER JSW Cyclotron - ASER NSLS - Project Reports + ASER ~$10M in reused concrete shielding FNAL JLAB  Storage for decay, Waiver for radwaste storage limit LANL LBL None due to strict CA state disposal reqmts LLNL Attempting to offset labor with sale of recyclable metals Releasable and recyclable quantities estimated ORNL Sandia SLAC

7 Question 4 - How work (was, is or proposed to be) performed, i. eQuestion 4 - How work (was, is or proposed to be) performed, i.e. in-house resources, subcontracted, or combination. Site In-house Resources Subcontracted Combination ANL IPNS - BNL Linac A, B, C & D beamlines AGS Components JSW Cyclotron NSLS & SDL Muon g-2 Experiment FNAL In-house and Subcontractors JLAB  12 GeV Upgrade  Demo of SOS spectrometer and heavy lifting LANL LBL Mostly subcontracted LLNL Initial rad surveys and segregation performed by in-house resources B-865 to be subcontracted B-175,251,280 & 292 to be handed over to EM ORNL Sandia In-house as part of waste operations SLAC

8 Question 5 - Please provide rough order estimates of the D&D costs, and estimates on cost avoidance including reuse and recycling. Site D&D costs Cost Avoidance/Reuse Recycled ANL $13M $10M ? BNL Linac A, B, C & D beamlines +Muon g-2 Experiment + AGS Components ~$12M NSLS ~ $7.4 M Linac A, B, C & D beamlines +Muon g-2 Experiment + AGS Components ~$70M NSLS ~ $70M to NSLSII SDL ~ $3.1 M Linac A, B, C & D beamlines +Muon g-2 Experiment + AGS Components ~$2M NSLS ~ $775K FNAL - 600 MT/annually JLAB  !2 GeV ~ $700K  ~$4M LANL LBL Old Town P1 ~ $34M P2 ~$53M, P3 &4 ~$20M None LLNL B-175 $16M, B-251 $62M, B-280 $52M, B-292 $52M Based on future scrap metal sales ORNL ORELA? and HRIBF? Sandia Part of Waste Disposal SLAC Totals $214.4 M $140 M $2.8 M

9 Next Steps Would again like feedback on the questions, potential answers, and use of the data within DOE Would like feedback on the best way to obtain the requested information next year Looking for several volunteers to work with Scott Davis on this in the future Would like to present an update survey summary report at ASW2018, if not sooner